You're simplifying it too much by saying graphics because obviously the graphics would be better but I meant the detail and design within the world. Clearly broken games that don't work at all are 'bad' but oblivion works, and for me, its a better game than Skyrim. In the end, what makes a game good or bad for a particular person? Opinions. Bugs? Seen more bugs in Skyrim than Oblivion, im not saying oblivion was bug free, just that I've seen less bugs in it than Skyrim. Had more crashes in Skyrim from just getting stuck in the enchanting table than in total in oblivion. In terms of stability, I've played about as much Oblivion as I have played Skyrim. Essentially 'un inventing' spell creation? Nothing of the sort in Skyrim, which I'd say is both a step backwards in the engine sense and the lore of the series. In oblivion, enchanting weapons was considerably more difficult than Skyrim meaning you couldn't go and get loads of enchantment effects etc to kill the bad guys with. In oblivion the bad guys weren't easy to kill with all weapons, unlike Skyrim's bad guys. Okay, I could nerf myself by not using awesome weapons but I shouldn't have to. If not, go and get a bigger more powerful sword. Just run up and hit something with an overpowered sword if it worked, great. Graphics, easier to mod, easier to use crafting, the people don't look like they are trying to kill you with their eyes whilst talking to you (but that's just graphics again).īut in my mind, the combat is so much easier (and more boring) than Oblivion's. Now you maybe right that some aspects of Skyrim are better.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |